What techniques, if any, employed by the Bush administration post-9/11 cross the line from permissible interrogation techniques into torture or CIDTP?

Review Chapter 32. Is torture ever justified from a moral standpoint? Should it be legal in certain situations? What techniques, if any, employed by the Bush administration post-9/11 cross the line from permissible interrogation techniques into torture or CIDTP? (Minimum 300 Words). 

Sample Solution

From a moral standpoint, torture can never be justified. Torture violates the fundamental human right to be free from cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, and it is widely recognized as a violation of human dignity and a form of exploitation. The use of torture is also incompatible with the principles of justice and equality and undermines the rule of law.

In terms of legality, the international community has established clear standards through the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which prohibits the use of torture under any circumstances and requires states to take steps to prevent and punish acts of torture. Many countries have incorporated these standards into their domestic law and have criminalized the use of torture.

Regarding the techniques employed by the Bush administration post-9/11, several techniques used by US interrogators in the war on terror have been widely criticized as amounting to torture or cruel, inhuman, and…Order a customized and more comprehensive answer here