Were there other ways to facilitate positive changes without putting sensitive information out here for the world to see?

Do some research on whistle blowing and Wikileaks. Do you feel that what Julian Assange was performing a service that was beneficial to our country? Keep in mind that information releases by folks like Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden helped change the way the government does business. Were there other ways to facilitate positive changes without putting sensitive information out here for the world to see? Is there a way to use your compass to morally justify the actions of Manning and/or Snowden? Be sure to apply at least one ethical system in depth, including application of at least 4 specific aspects of that system in your posts. 

Sample Solution

Whistleblowing refers to the act of exposing illegal, unethical, or immoral activities within an organization. Wikileaks is an organization that gained global attention for releasing classified documents and videos on its website, revealing government secrets and other sensitive information. Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, was charged with multiple counts of espionage and computer misuse in connection with the release of classified information.

Some argue that Assange was performing a service that was beneficial to our country by exposing government secrets and holding those in power accountable. Others believe that Assange’s actions were harmful to national security and put people’s lives in danger.

According to the ethical system of utilitarianism, actions are considered right if they produce the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. From this perspective, the actions of Manning and Snowden could be justified as they revealed information that was in the public interest and brought about positive changes in government policies, such as increased transparency and accountability. However, opponents argue that the release of sensitive information can have negative consequences, including compromised national security and potential harm to individuals named in the documents.

On the other hand, the deontological ethical system focuses on the moral duty to do what is right, regardless of the consequences. From this perspective, the actions of Manning and Snowden may not be justified as they violated their legal and ethical obligations to protect classified information. However, supporters argue that their actions were driven by a sense of moral duty to expose government wrongdoing.

Ultimately, the ethical justification for whistleblowing and information leaks is a complex and debated issue. While it is important to protect national security and individual privacy, transparency…NEED A COMPREHENSIVE ANSWER? POST YOUR ORDER